NB: I have updated the image of the "Language House" shown in this post.
You can see the more recent version at my post on Tuesday, 11 November 2014.
Some of my most enjoyable professional experiences in recent years have been the opportunities to share my research findings (and those of other academics) with audiences of primary school teachers at professional development days all around Australia. In the early days, these presentations had a relatively narrow focus on findings derived from research carried out by me and Martine Powell (Deakin University) on the oral language skills of young offenders.
You can see the more recent version at my post on Tuesday, 11 November 2014.
Some of my most enjoyable professional experiences in recent years have been the opportunities to share my research findings (and those of other academics) with audiences of primary school teachers at professional development days all around Australia. In the early days, these presentations had a relatively narrow focus on findings derived from research carried out by me and Martine Powell (Deakin University) on the oral language skills of young offenders.
I
guess this work, which we commenced back in 1999, was relatively novel at the
time, and we were pleased with the level of interest shown in the findings, by
both education and welfare sectors. It won’t surprise too many readers of this
Blog that our studies have shown that some 50% of male young offenders have a
clinically significant, yet previously undiagnosed language impairment
(compared to around 7-10% in the population as a whole). These language
difficulties can’t be “explained away” on the basis of low IQ, and exist across
a wide spectrum of expressive and receptive verbal skills. In many cases, our
data showed that young people who end up in the youth justice system had in
fact been identified in the early years of school as needing some extra
assistance with language and learning tasks. Sadly, such extra support was not
sufficient to ensure early academic success – in itself a significant
protective factor that works against the association with antisocial peers and
early school disengagement. Young people in our studies overwhelming parted
company from school around Year 8 – but certainly not with mastery of the Year
8 curriculum under the belts – more on this in future posts.
Not
surprisingly, it wasn’t long before the focus of these presentations shifted
from talking about young people who had “fallen off the cliff”, to ways of
building better fences at the top of the cliff. Clearly, the fence builders
need to be our early years educators. So I started to talk about what “oral
language competence” is and why it is important. Initially I felt a little
self-conscious about going down this path – I was talking to early-years
teachers after all, and surely they had traversed this territory in some depth
in their pre-service training? The clear engagement with the topic and evidence
of “ah ha!” moments in these audiences suggested otherwise, and I found myself
searching for metaphors to capture the importance of oral language competence
in the early years of life (and school).
I
wanted to convey two important “take home” messages: firstly, that oral
language competence is critical in its own right, because it underpins the
ability to engage with the world around us, to form and maintain relationships,
and to negotiate the business of everyday life, across personal, educational,
social, vocational and commercial realms. Secondly, oral language competence underpins
the transition to literacy in the first three years of school. I’ll come
back to this issue in later Blog posts, but we should never underestimate the
extent to which learning how to read is a biologically “unnatural” act, and in
order to succeed, children need both prerequisite oral language skills and
appropriate and sustained instruction.
These two key points formed metaphorical “pillars” in my mind, so I posed a rhetorical
scenario one day –
Suppose you were going to
build a house. You wouldn’t start with the walls, and you most certainly
wouldn’t start with the roof. When you build a house, you know that you have to
start with foundations, and it pays to make your foundations as strong as you
can. When we think about children’s academic and social success then, we can
position oral language (talking and listening) skills as the granite-like
foundations, and then we can construct the walls – on one side, the development
of prosocial interpersonal skills, and on the other, the transition to
literacy.
Note that these walls are
embedded into the foundations, not just sitting lightly on top. Once the walls
are in place, we can think about the roof of our metaphorical “house” – the
academic outcomes, social and economic engagement and marketable employment
skills that we want our young people to achieve in order to be part of the
mainstream.
© Pamela
Snow 2013
Enjoying the blog. Keep it up
ReplyDelete